The Economist Drops a Dime on Coal

The US print edition of The Economist did not have the article on Weblogs which Dave mentioned on Scripting News. But the cover editorial is worth a read, I’m glad to see the editors arguing for the phasing out of coal.

It’s a major source of CO2, coal dust and smoke is a health hazard, and most of its use is subsidized.

Possibly Related posts (machine generated):

  1. Is Bush Protecting Steel, the Republican Majority, or what?
  2. Health care at the margin: the case of Tanzania
  3. Deirdre McCloskey’s Diary
  4. Sharecroppers, Pirates and Cartels
  5. Down Amoung the Economists

More like this: , .