<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: DOM 3 XPath in Web Kit</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.whump.com/moreLikeThis/2006/09/04/dom-3-xpath-in-web-kit/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.whump.com/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&#038;feed=Articles+%28RSS2%29&#038;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.whump.com%2FmoreLikeThis%2F2006%2F09%2F04%2Fdom-3-xpath-in-web-kit%2F&#038;seed_title=DOM+3+XPath+in+Web+Kit</link>
	<description>Where is their vote?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 01:01:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: geecu</title>
		<link>http://www.whump.com/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&#038;feed=Articles+%28RSS2%29&#038;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.whump.com%2FmoreLikeThis%2F2006%2F09%2F04%2Fdom-3-xpath-in-web-kit%2F&#038;seed_title=DOM+3+XPath+in+Web+Kit/comment-page-1/#comment-13473</link>
		<dc:creator>geecu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 18:11:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whump.com/moreLikeThis/2006/09/04/dom-3-xpath-in-web-kit/#comment-13473</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve tested it (FF and Safari on Mac), //div[@class=&quot;class&quot;] is about 20 times *slower* than getElementByClassName. Maybe I was doing something wrong... have you tested it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve tested it (FF and Safari on Mac), //div[@class="class"] is about 20 times *slower* than getElementByClassName. Maybe I was doing something wrong&#8230; have you tested it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Humphries</title>
		<link>http://www.whump.com/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&#038;feed=Articles+%28RSS2%29&#038;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.whump.com%2FmoreLikeThis%2F2006%2F09%2F04%2Fdom-3-xpath-in-web-kit%2F&#038;seed_title=DOM+3+XPath+in+Web+Kit/comment-page-1/#comment-2955</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Humphries</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Oct 2006 18:18:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whump.com/moreLikeThis/2006/09/04/dom-3-xpath-in-web-kit/#comment-2955</guid>
		<description>@ jmdesp: no doubt that a native version of getElementBySelector would be fast. It&#039;s one of the items the WHAT-WG considering. 

But given the choice between Prototype&#039;s getElementsByClassName(), and a native XPath expression, I&#039;ll take the later.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ jmdesp: no doubt that a native version of getElementBySelector would be fast. It&#8217;s one of the items the WHAT-WG considering. </p>
<p>But given the choice between Prototype&#8217;s getElementsByClassName(), and a native XPath expression, I&#8217;ll take the later.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jmdesp</title>
		<link>http://www.whump.com/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&#038;feed=Articles+%28RSS2%29&#038;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.whump.com%2FmoreLikeThis%2F2006%2F09%2F04%2Fdom-3-xpath-in-web-kit%2F&#038;seed_title=DOM+3+XPath+in+Web+Kit/comment-page-1/#comment-2950</link>
		<dc:creator>jmdesp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Oct 2006 16:02:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whump.com/moreLikeThis/2006/09/04/dom-3-xpath-in-web-kit/#comment-2950</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t understand. Why would byClassName be more expensive to implement than xpath ? Or is it because you can&#039;t point to exactly what you want and need expensive enumerations ?
Whatever getElementById will always be the fastest choice, and it&#039;s better to reorganise the page in order to use it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t understand. Why would byClassName be more expensive to implement than xpath ? Or is it because you can&#8217;t point to exactly what you want and need expensive enumerations ?<br />
Whatever getElementById will always be the fastest choice, and it&#8217;s better to reorganise the page in order to use it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

