<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>whump.com &#124; More Like This WebLog &#187; pundits</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.whump.com/moreLikeThis/tag/pundits/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.whump.com/moreLikeThis</link>
	<description>Where is their vote?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Dec 2009 04:55:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>What, it&#8217;s not like you don&#8217;t have a DualCore iMac</title>
		<link>http://www.whump.com/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&#038;feed=Articles+%28RSS2%29&#038;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.whump.com%2FmoreLikeThis%2F2006%2F02%2F15%2F04411%2F&#038;seed_title=What%2C+it%26%238217%3Bs+not+like+you+don%26%238217%3Bt+have+a+DualCore+iMac</link>
		<comments>http://www.whump.com/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&#038;feed=Articles+%28RSS2%29&#038;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.whump.com%2FmoreLikeThis%2F2006%2F02%2F15%2F04411%2F&#038;seed_title=What%2C+it%26%238217%3Bs+not+like+you+don%26%238217%3Bt+have+a+DualCore+iMac#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2006 02:48:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bill Humphries</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[linklist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[javascript]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pundits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whump.com/moreLikeThis/2006/02/15/04411/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tim Bray: Maybe the DOM-wrangling isn&#8217;t all that efficient&#8230; but who cares? The browser totally doesn&#8217;t have anything better to do.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.tbray.org/ongoing/When/200x/2006/02/14/AJAX-Performance">Tim Bray</a>: <q>Maybe the DOM-wrangling isn&#8217;t all that efficient&#8230; but who cares? The browser totally doesn&#8217;t have anything better to do.</q></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.whump.com/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&#038;feed=Articles+%28RSS2%29&#038;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.whump.com%2FmoreLikeThis%2F2006%2F02%2F15%2F04411%2F&#038;seed_title=What%2C+it%26%238217%3Bs+not+like+you+don%26%238217%3Bt+have+a+DualCore+iMac/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bruce Sterling in Wikiquote</title>
		<link>http://www.whump.com/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&#038;feed=Articles+%28RSS2%29&#038;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.whump.com%2FmoreLikeThis%2F2006%2F01%2F22%2F04396%2F&#038;seed_title=Bruce+Sterling+in+Wikiquote</link>
		<comments>http://www.whump.com/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&#038;feed=Articles+%28RSS2%29&#038;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.whump.com%2FmoreLikeThis%2F2006%2F01%2F22%2F04396%2F&#038;seed_title=Bruce+Sterling+in+Wikiquote#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2006 07:59:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bill Humphries</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[linklist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[science-fiction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[writing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pundits]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whump.com/moreLikeThis/2006/01/22/04396/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Quotations of Chairman Bruce, via Kathryn Cramer. It&#8217;s all recent stuff, however, someone needs to add selections from Cheap Truth, and SMOF BBS.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Bruce_Sterling">The Quotations of Chairman Bruce</a>, via <a href="http://kathryncramer.typepad.com/">Kathryn Cramer</a>. It&#8217;s all recent stuff, however, someone needs to add selections from <cite>Cheap Truth,</cite> and <cite>SMOF BBS</cite>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.whump.com/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&#038;feed=Articles+%28RSS2%29&#038;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.whump.com%2FmoreLikeThis%2F2006%2F01%2F22%2F04396%2F&#038;seed_title=Bruce+Sterling+in+Wikiquote/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is the The Huffington Post a blog or an online magazine?</title>
		<link>http://www.whump.com/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&#038;feed=Articles+%28RSS2%29&#038;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.whump.com%2FmoreLikeThis%2F2005%2F12%2F06%2F04371%2F&#038;seed_title=Is+the+The+Huffington+Post+a+blog+or+an+online+magazine%3F</link>
		<comments>http://www.whump.com/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&#038;feed=Articles+%28RSS2%29&#038;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.whump.com%2FmoreLikeThis%2F2005%2F12%2F06%2F04371%2F&#038;seed_title=Is+the+The+Huffington+Post+a+blog+or+an+online+magazine%3F#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2005 08:04:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bill Humphries</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[writing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pundits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web-logs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whump.com/moreLikeThis/2005/12/06/04371/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jorn reminds us of our roots: but i was distressed to discover that the original intent of the expression &#8216;web logging&#8217; (to log your websurfing with public annotations) has gone entirely by the boards Jorn, by the way, was the first person I saw using the term &#8216;weblog&#8217;.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jorn <a href="http://robotwisdom2.blogspot.com/2005/12/huffington-post-is-not-blog.html" class="external">reminds us of our roots</a>:</p>
<blockquote cite="http://robotwisdom2.blogspot.com/2005/12/huffington-post-is-not-blog.html">
<p>but i was distressed to discover </p>
<p>  that the original intent </p>
<p>  of the expression &#8216;web logging&#8217;</p>
<p>  (to log your websurfing </p>
<p>  with public annotations) </p>
<p>  has gone entirely by the boards</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Jorn, by the way, was the first person I saw using the term &#8216;weblog&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.whump.com/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&#038;feed=Articles+%28RSS2%29&#038;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.whump.com%2FmoreLikeThis%2F2005%2F12%2F06%2F04371%2F&#038;seed_title=Is+the+The+Huffington+Post+a+blog+or+an+online+magazine%3F/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Jonas Luster warns about Cargo Cult buisness plans</title>
		<link>http://www.whump.com/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&#038;feed=Articles+%28RSS2%29&#038;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.whump.com%2FmoreLikeThis%2F2005%2F09%2F25%2F04285%2F&#038;seed_title=Jonas+Luster+warns+about+Cargo+Cult+buisness+plans</link>
		<comments>http://www.whump.com/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&#038;feed=Articles+%28RSS2%29&#038;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.whump.com%2FmoreLikeThis%2F2005%2F09%2F25%2F04285%2F&#038;seed_title=Jonas+Luster+warns+about+Cargo+Cult+buisness+plans#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Sep 2005 23:35:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bill Humphries</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[emergent-behavior]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pundits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whump.com/moreLikeThis/2005/09/25/04285/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When software shows up at my door with a beer, watches What not to Wear with me on my sofa, then gets me laid afterward, that will be social software. Jonas on stage at Webzine 2005, arguing that Social Software really is Community Software. Oh, and don&#8217;t use the term &#8220;long tail&#8221; around him, unless [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>When software shows up at my door with a beer, watches <cite>What not to Wear</cite> with me on my sofa, then gets me laid afterward, that will be social software.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Jonas on stage at <a href="http://www.webzine2005.com/" title="Lumbering back to life.">Webzine 2005</a>, arguing <a href="http://jluster.org/articles/2005/09/23/and-then-there-was" class="external">that Social Software really is Community Software</a>.</p>
<p>Oh, and don&#8217;t use the term &#8220;<a href="http://longtail.typepad.com/the_long_tail/">long tail</a>&#8221; around him, unless you&#8217;re talking about your pet lemur.</p>
<p>He also asks, if you are talking about the long tail, please be prepared to answer the following:</p>
<ul>
<li>What is Zipf?</li>
<li>Who was Pareto and what did he did?</li>
<li>What&#8217;s the formula describing a <span class="snark" title="1/log(n)">Zipf distribution</span>?</li>
</ul>
<p>Technorati: <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/webzine2005" rel="tag">webzine2005</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.whump.com/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&#038;feed=Articles+%28RSS2%29&#038;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.whump.com%2FmoreLikeThis%2F2005%2F09%2F25%2F04285%2F&#038;seed_title=Jonas+Luster+warns+about+Cargo+Cult+buisness+plans/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Jon Carroll on Daylight Savings Time</title>
		<link>http://www.whump.com/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&#038;feed=Articles+%28RSS2%29&#038;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.whump.com%2FmoreLikeThis%2F2005%2F04%2F20%2F04186%2F&#038;seed_title=Jon+Carroll+on+Daylight+Savings+Time</link>
		<comments>http://www.whump.com/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&#038;feed=Articles+%28RSS2%29&#038;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.whump.com%2FmoreLikeThis%2F2005%2F04%2F20%2F04186%2F&#038;seed_title=Jon+Carroll+on+Daylight+Savings+Time#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2005 07:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bill Humphries</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[bay-area]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pundits]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whump.com/moreLikeThis/2005/04/20/04186/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Great lines from Jon Carroll&#8217;s column today: Jesuits are so cool. That&#8217;s the problem with being an agnostic: no Jesuits. &#8230; Americans trust scientists to tell us what time it is, but a lot of them do not trust scientists to tell them how old the Earth is. Go figure. Link]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great lines from Jon Carroll&#8217;s column today:</p>
<blockquote cite="http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/chronicle/archive/2005/04/15/DDG27BCFPA1.DTL">
<p>Jesuits are so cool. That&#8217;s the problem with being an agnostic: no Jesuits. &#8230;</p>
<p>Americans trust scientists to tell us what time it is, but a lot of them do not trust scientists to tell them how old the Earth is. Go figure.</p>
</blockquote>
<p><a href="http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/chronicle/archive/2005/04/15/DDG27BCFPA1.DTL">Link</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.whump.com/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&#038;feed=Articles+%28RSS2%29&#038;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.whump.com%2FmoreLikeThis%2F2005%2F04%2F20%2F04186%2F&#038;seed_title=Jon+Carroll+on+Daylight+Savings+Time/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lessig&#8217;s Bad Code for Porn</title>
		<link>http://www.whump.com/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&#038;feed=Articles+%28RSS2%29&#038;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.whump.com%2FmoreLikeThis%2F2004%2F08%2F31%2F04060%2F&#038;seed_title=Lessig%26%238217%3Bs+Bad+Code+for+Porn</link>
		<comments>http://www.whump.com/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&#038;feed=Articles+%28RSS2%29&#038;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.whump.com%2FmoreLikeThis%2F2004%2F08%2F31%2F04060%2F&#038;seed_title=Lessig%26%238217%3Bs+Bad+Code+for+Porn#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2004 07:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bill Humphries</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[censorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pundits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whump.com/moreLikeThis/2004/08/31/04060/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Stanford Law professor Lawrence Lessig makes a daft suggestion: require adult content providers to wrap &#60;porn&#62; ... &#60;/porn&#62; around the naughty stuff, and direct brower developers to ignore such tags unless a parent approves. This fails in the same way domain schemes such as .xxx or .adult fail: There can be no universal standard for [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stanford Law professor Lawrence Lessig <a href="http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/12.09/view.html?pg=5" class="external">makes a daft suggestion:</a> require adult content providers to wrap <code>&lt;porn&gt; ... &lt;/porn&gt;</code> around the naughty stuff, and direct brower developers to ignore such tags unless a parent approves.</p>
<p>This fails in the same way domain schemes such as .xxx or .adult fail:</p>
<ul>
<li>There can be no universal standard for defining content inappropriate for minors,</li>
<li>
<p>and such a regime would be easily gamed by anyone wanting to use the government to censor content they don&#8217;t like.</p>
<p>The technique is simple, just find a friendly jurisdiction and seek an injunction forcing anyone providing content about birth control, sex education, rape prevention, gay rights, and anything else controversial to wrap it in the aforementioned <code>porn</code> tag.</p>
</li>
<li>Besides, the parental control would be routed around faster than you can say DVD Jon.</li>
</ul>
<p>Ugh, bad idea Professor, just walk away.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.whump.com/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&#038;feed=Articles+%28RSS2%29&#038;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.whump.com%2FmoreLikeThis%2F2004%2F08%2F31%2F04060%2F&#038;seed_title=Lessig%26%238217%3Bs+Bad+Code+for+Porn/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>I laugh at your IDE&#8217;s Debugger</title>
		<link>http://www.whump.com/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&#038;feed=Articles+%28RSS2%29&#038;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.whump.com%2FmoreLikeThis%2F2004%2F06%2F20%2F04011%2F&#038;seed_title=I+laugh+at+your+IDE%26%238217%3Bs+Debugger</link>
		<comments>http://www.whump.com/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&#038;feed=Articles+%28RSS2%29&#038;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.whump.com%2FmoreLikeThis%2F2004%2F06%2F20%2F04011%2F&#038;seed_title=I+laugh+at+your+IDE%26%238217%3Bs+Debugger#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jun 2004 07:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bill Humphries</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[software-development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pundits]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whump.com/moreLikeThis/2004/06/20/04011/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Normaly, this is the sort of thing that goes in a link log, but Tim Bray&#8217;s advice is good enough to deserve a full entry. &#8220;When the going gets tough, the tough use &#8220;print.&#8221;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Normaly, this is the sort of thing that goes in a <em>link log</em>, but <a href="http://www.tbray.org/ongoing/When/200x/2004/06/17/DeDebPrint" class="external">Tim Bray&#8217;s advice</a> is good enough to deserve a full entry.</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;When the going gets tough, the tough use &#8220;print.&#8221;</p>
</blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.whump.com/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&#038;feed=Articles+%28RSS2%29&#038;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.whump.com%2FmoreLikeThis%2F2004%2F06%2F20%2F04011%2F&#038;seed_title=I+laugh+at+your+IDE%26%238217%3Bs+Debugger/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bruce Sterling on TIA</title>
		<link>http://www.whump.com/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&#038;feed=Articles+%28RSS2%29&#038;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.whump.com%2FmoreLikeThis%2F2003%2F06%2F04%2F03506%2F&#038;seed_title=Bruce+Sterling+on+TIA</link>
		<comments>http://www.whump.com/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&#038;feed=Articles+%28RSS2%29&#038;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.whump.com%2FmoreLikeThis%2F2003%2F06%2F04%2F03506%2F&#038;seed_title=Bruce+Sterling+on+TIA#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2003 07:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bill Humphries</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pundits]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whump.com/moreLikeThis/2003/06/04/03506/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Declan McCullagh asks Bruce Sterling about Total Information Awareness. I&#8217;ll tell you what will happen if it were an effective TIA. There would immediately be a series of coups inside the Republican Party as the people who owned the KGB survival mechanism were systemically outed and &#8220;Trent Lotted&#8221;&#8230;It would be profoundly destabilizing. Their sexual affairs [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://news.com.com/2008-1082_3-1010864.html" class="external">Declan McCullagh asks Bruce Sterling about Total Information Awareness</a>.</p>
<blockquote><p class="quote">I&#8217;ll tell you what will happen if it were an effective TIA. There would immediately be a series of coups inside the Republican Party as the people who owned the KGB survival mechanism were systemically outed and &#8220;Trent Lotted&#8221;&#8230;It would be profoundly destabilizing. Their sexual affairs would be public. They&#8217;d be &#8220;Lewinskied.&#8221; They&#8217;d be &#8220;Whitewatered.&#8221;</p>
</blockquote>
<p>I&#8217;ve been thinking about <acronym title="Total Information Awareness">TIA</acronym> since annotating content and the semantic web were hot topics at <a href="http://www.oscom.org/Conferences/Cambridge/Program/">OSCOM Cambridge</a>. As much as people fear TIA, we want it for ourselves. I&#8217;d love a software tool which consumes my email and web trail, then whispers to me, and only me, all  the insights and connections it found.</p>
<p>But if we have Personal TIA, then the government will have TIA. No amount of legislating will stop it. Not because folks like Pondexter are bad, but because if there&#8217;s a TIA tool, and it&#8217;s not used, and there&#8217;s another major attack on the US, then the polity will howl and scream: <em>Why didn&#8217;t you spy on our conversations, and look through our underwear drawers!</em> But I doubt you&#8217;ll stop an Islamic Fascist by looking through Mary Jo Plotnick&#8217;s Yahoo Chat logs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.whump.com/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&#038;feed=Articles+%28RSS2%29&#038;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.whump.com%2FmoreLikeThis%2F2003%2F06%2F04%2F03506%2F&#038;seed_title=Bruce+Sterling+on+TIA/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Norman Mailer on The New American Century</title>
		<link>http://www.whump.com/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&#038;feed=Articles+%28RSS2%29&#038;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.whump.com%2FmoreLikeThis%2F2003%2F03%2F28%2F03402%2F&#038;seed_title=Norman+Mailer+on+The+New+American+Century</link>
		<comments>http://www.whump.com/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&#038;feed=Articles+%28RSS2%29&#038;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.whump.com%2FmoreLikeThis%2F2003%2F03%2F28%2F03402%2F&#038;seed_title=Norman+Mailer+on+The+New+American+Century#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2003 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bill Humphries</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[bay-area]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pundits]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whump.com/moreLikeThis/2003/03/28/03402/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Listen! Norman Mailer addressed the Commonwealth Club of California this past February 20th on the subject of the at the time, incipient war on Saddam. He does not apologize for the perfidy and lies of Saddam. He acknowledges their role in the current crisis, but he is even more fearful of this New American Century, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Listen! <a href="http://www.commonwealthclub.org/archive/03/03-02mailer-audio.html" class="external">Norman Mailer addressed the Commonwealth Club of California</a> this past February 20th on the subject of the at the time, incipient war on Saddam. He does not apologize for the perfidy and lies of Saddam. He acknowledges their role in the current crisis, but he is even more fearful of this New American Century, which the group he calls the &#8220;Flag Conservatives,&#8221; are bent on conjuring. [ Real Player ]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.whump.com/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&#038;feed=Articles+%28RSS2%29&#038;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.whump.com%2FmoreLikeThis%2F2003%2F03%2F28%2F03402%2F&#038;seed_title=Norman+Mailer+on+The+New+American+Century/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Richard Dawkins rants on the Iraqi War</title>
		<link>http://www.whump.com/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&#038;feed=Articles+%28RSS2%29&#038;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.whump.com%2FmoreLikeThis%2F2003%2F03%2F23%2F03386%2F&#038;seed_title=Richard+Dawkins+rants+on+the+Iraqi+War</link>
		<comments>http://www.whump.com/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&#038;feed=Articles+%28RSS2%29&#038;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.whump.com%2FmoreLikeThis%2F2003%2F03%2F23%2F03386%2F&#038;seed_title=Richard+Dawkins+rants+on+the+Iraqi+War#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Mar 2003 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bill Humphries</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[pundits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[putdowns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[religion]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whump.com/moreLikeThis/2003/03/23/03386/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It wouldn&#8217;t be a global catastrophe without the ne plus ultra of anti-theists servicing the believers with a bunker-buster of purple prose (deserved or not): Bush seems sincerely to see the world as a battleground between Good and Evil, St Michael&#8217;s angels against the forces of Lucifer. We&#8217;re gonna smoke out the Amalekites, send a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It wouldn&#8217;t be a global catastrophe without the <em>ne plus ultra</em> of anti-theists <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/comment/story/0,3604,919538,00.html" class="external">servicing the believers with a bunker-buster of purple prose</a> (deserved or not):</p>
<blockquote><p class="quote">Bush seems sincerely to see the world as a battleground between Good and Evil, St Michael&#8217;s angels against the forces of Lucifer. We&#8217;re gonna smoke out the Amalekites, send a posse after the Midianites, smite them all and let God deal with their souls. Minds doped up on this kind of cod theology have a hard time distinguishing between Saddam Hussein and Osama bin Laden.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>England may not have a separation of Church and State, but you&#8217;ll never see someone unload like that in the American mainstream press. Dawkins makes Katha Pollit sound all sweetness and light.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.whump.com/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&#038;feed=Articles+%28RSS2%29&#038;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.whump.com%2FmoreLikeThis%2F2003%2F03%2F23%2F03386%2F&#038;seed_title=Richard+Dawkins+rants+on+the+Iraqi+War/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Gulf War Drinking Game</title>
		<link>http://www.whump.com/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&#038;feed=Articles+%28RSS2%29&#038;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.whump.com%2FmoreLikeThis%2F2003%2F03%2F18%2F03365%2F&#038;seed_title=The+Gulf+War+Drinking+Game</link>
		<comments>http://www.whump.com/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&#038;feed=Articles+%28RSS2%29&#038;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.whump.com%2FmoreLikeThis%2F2003%2F03%2F18%2F03365%2F&#038;seed_title=The+Gulf+War+Drinking+Game#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2003 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bill Humphries</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[humor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[disasters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pundits]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whump.com/moreLikeThis/2003/03/18/03365/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[ via Dan Hon ] Break out the hard stuff because it&#8217;s almost time for the Gulf War Drinking Game.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[ via <a href="http://danhon.com/ec/">Dan Hon</a> ] Break out the hard stuff because it&#8217;s almost time for <a href="http://www.gulfwardrinkinggame.com/" class="external">the Gulf War Drinking Game</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.whump.com/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&#038;feed=Articles+%28RSS2%29&#038;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.whump.com%2FmoreLikeThis%2F2003%2F03%2F18%2F03365%2F&#038;seed_title=The+Gulf+War+Drinking+Game/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>I think pearl-clutching is an entirely appropriate response.</title>
		<link>http://www.whump.com/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&#038;feed=Articles+%28RSS2%29&#038;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.whump.com%2FmoreLikeThis%2F2003%2F03%2F02%2F03338%2F&#038;seed_title=I+think+pearl-clutching+is+an+entirely+appropriate+response.</link>
		<comments>http://www.whump.com/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&#038;feed=Articles+%28RSS2%29&#038;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.whump.com%2FmoreLikeThis%2F2003%2F03%2F02%2F03338%2F&#038;seed_title=I+think+pearl-clutching+is+an+entirely+appropriate+response.#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Mar 2003 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bill Humphries</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conservatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pundits]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whump.com/moreLikeThis/2003/03/02/03338/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Kip savages Savage.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kip <a href="http://www.longstoryshortpier.com/archives/squawkbox/000275.html" class="external">savages</a> Savage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.whump.com/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&#038;feed=Articles+%28RSS2%29&#038;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.whump.com%2FmoreLikeThis%2F2003%2F03%2F02%2F03338%2F&#038;seed_title=I+think+pearl-clutching+is+an+entirely+appropriate+response./feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>On &#8216;Fisking&#8217; and &#8216;Idiotarian&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://www.whump.com/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&#038;feed=Articles+%28RSS2%29&#038;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.whump.com%2FmoreLikeThis%2F2002%2F10%2F17%2F03110%2F&#038;seed_title=On+%26%238216%3BFisking%26%238217%3B+and+%26%238216%3BIdiotarian%26%238217%3B</link>
		<comments>http://www.whump.com/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&#038;feed=Articles+%28RSS2%29&#038;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.whump.com%2FmoreLikeThis%2F2002%2F10%2F17%2F03110%2F&#038;seed_title=On+%26%238216%3BFisking%26%238217%3B+and+%26%238216%3BIdiotarian%26%238217%3B#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Oct 2002 07:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bill Humphries</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[language]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PHP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pundits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whump.com/moreLikeThis/2002/10/17/03110/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[ via RC3.org ] Thank you, Anil. I would like you to know that idiotarian is not a word. Yes, I recognize that English is a living, evolving language, where additions are made by usage and not by mandate, but understand, neither are they made through sheer repetition. Fisk is not a transitive verb; It&#8217;s [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[ via RC3.org ] <a href="http://www.dashes.com/anil/index.php?archives/003548.php" class="external">Thank you, Anil</a>.</p>
<blockquote><p class="quote">I would like you to know that idiotarian is not a word. Yes, I recognize that English is a living, evolving language, where additions are made by usage and not by mandate, but understand, neither are they made through sheer repetition. Fisk is not a transitive verb; It&#8217;s a surname. It&#8217;s no longer amusing to watch you make yourself sound silly.</p>
</blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.whump.com/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&#038;feed=Articles+%28RSS2%29&#038;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.whump.com%2FmoreLikeThis%2F2002%2F10%2F17%2F03110%2F&#038;seed_title=On+%26%238216%3BFisking%26%238217%3B+and+%26%238216%3BIdiotarian%26%238217%3B/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why &#8216;libertarian-socialist&#8217; isn&#8217;t as contradictory as you may have thought</title>
		<link>http://www.whump.com/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&#038;feed=Articles+%28RSS2%29&#038;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.whump.com%2FmoreLikeThis%2F2002%2F08%2F29%2F03033%2F&#038;seed_title=Why+%26%238216%3Blibertarian-socialist%26%238217%3B+isn%26%238217%3Bt+as+contradictory+as+you+may+have+thought</link>
		<comments>http://www.whump.com/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&#038;feed=Articles+%28RSS2%29&#038;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.whump.com%2FmoreLikeThis%2F2002%2F08%2F29%2F03033%2F&#038;seed_title=Why+%26%238216%3Blibertarian-socialist%26%238217%3B+isn%26%238217%3Bt+as+contradictory+as+you+may+have+thought#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Aug 2002 07:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bill Humphries</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[progressives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pundits]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whump.com/moreLikeThis/2002/08/29/03033/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[ via RC3 ] Over at Lake Effect (which is great to see back in business) Dan Hartung explains the seemingly contradictory term &#8216;libertarian-socialist&#8217;.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[ via RC3 ] Over at Lake Effect (which is great to see back in business) Dan Hartung <a href="http://www.lakefx.nu/archive/2002_08_25_index.html#80713347" class="external">explains the seemingly contradictory term</a> &#8216;libertarian-socialist&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.whump.com/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&#038;feed=Articles+%28RSS2%29&#038;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.whump.com%2FmoreLikeThis%2F2002%2F08%2F29%2F03033%2F&#038;seed_title=Why+%26%238216%3Blibertarian-socialist%26%238217%3B+isn%26%238217%3Bt+as+contradictory+as+you+may+have+thought/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Avedon Defends MWO</title>
		<link>http://www.whump.com/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&#038;feed=Articles+%28RSS2%29&#038;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.whump.com%2FmoreLikeThis%2F2002%2F08%2F16%2F03012%2F&#038;seed_title=Avedon+Defends+MWO</link>
		<comments>http://www.whump.com/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&#038;feed=Articles+%28RSS2%29&#038;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.whump.com%2FmoreLikeThis%2F2002%2F08%2F16%2F03012%2F&#038;seed_title=Avedon+Defends+MWO#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Aug 2002 07:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bill Humphries</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[conservatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[progressives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pundits]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whump.com/moreLikeThis/2002/08/16/03012/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Spinsanity went after MWO over their tone. That&#8217;s all nice and idealistic, but the &#8216;other side&#8217; isn&#8217;t playing nice. They throw dirt in your face, dip their rapiers in the sewer, and in the case of The Blonde from Hell &#8212; turn both keys within five seconds of each other and let loose with rhetorical [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.spinsanity.org/columns/20020815.html" title="Spinsanity's critique of MWO">Spinsanity</a> went after <acronym title="Media Whores Online">MWO</acronym> over their tone. That&#8217;s all nice and idealistic, but the &#8216;other side&#8217; isn&#8217;t playing nice. They throw dirt in your face, dip their rapiers in the sewer, and in the case of The Blonde from Hell &#8212; turn both keys within five seconds of each other and let loose with rhetorical weapons of mass destruction.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.sideshow.idps.co.uk/saug02.htm#16at1502" class="external">Avedon Carol weighs in on the debate</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p class="quote">Spinsanity has tried to equate MWO with Limbaugh and Coulter. This is a bad joke; there is simply no equivalence at all. MWO attacks media sources for delivering &#8220;fair and balanced news&#8221; that is manifestly slanted and false. Rush and Ann are propagators of such falsehoods.</p>
</blockquote>
<p><em>Meanwhile</em> Saturday, the wee hours: There&#8217;s <a href="http://nielsenhayden.com/electrolite/archives/2002_08.html#000426" title="See the comments on his post.">a longish debate on the matter in Patrick Nielsen Hayden&#8217;s Electrolite</a>. Patrick and Teresa come down on the side of the angels, arguing that using Rush and Ann&#8217;s tactics are morally corrosive. The response has been that the Right fights dirty and playing nice doesn&#8217;t work.</p>
<p>But accepting the latter means that the audience &#8212; the American polity &#8212; is either too stupid or jaded to listen to rational argument. If that&#8217;s the case, then American Democracy is over and done. If it&#8217;s not, then you have reasons or at least faith that Americans care about policy and politics more than who was voted off American Idol this week. I&#8217;m telling you that it&#8217;s hard me to accept that premise these days.</p>
<p>Patrick quotes Jo Walton on his site: &#8220;Peace is an active and complex thing and sometimes fighting is part of what it takes to get it.&#8221; And that doesn&#8217;t mean &#8220;the ends justify the means.&#8221; So how do you get angry, busy and making the right things happen? This is a fight, with tangible things at stake: our rights, our prosperity, and how history judges us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.whump.com/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&#038;feed=Articles+%28RSS2%29&#038;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.whump.com%2FmoreLikeThis%2F2002%2F08%2F16%2F03012%2F&#038;seed_title=Avedon+Defends+MWO/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
